[<1/1,000,000th%]

That's all very interesting, LightCrusader, but was Carbon 14 dating used in the study cited here?

Everybody's chuckling at you because carbon dating can only be used back to about 50,000 years.

PatrickHenry may have a link on his homepage to radiometric dating. It was a fairly simple article to follow for non-scientists. Or you can google on your own.

[Alter Kaker]

Everybody's chuckling at you because carbon dating can only be used back to about 50,000 years.

No, nobody's chuckling at me, because the question was rhetorical. It's patently obvious that radiometric dating isn't at issue here, which is why the (spurious) attack on its validity is totally irrelevent.

[PatrickHenry]

PatrickHenry may have a link on his homepage to radiometric dating.

This may suffice for the purpose:
Radiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective. A Bible-believing Christian's viewpoint