Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WildTurkey

There are ID'ers who are not Christian. They are few and far between, but they exist.

I would call ID a scientific theory that competes against evolutionary theory, that is compatible with what scripture tells us and that is also compatible with the evidence.

You characterize ID as a "ruse" and as a synomynous with "creation" so that you can ban ID papers from being published. And then having done so, you can mock ID for having been published.


263 posted on 02/17/2005 12:38:43 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN
I would call ID a scientific theory

Then you would be wrong, at least as ID stands now. Provide some notion of what the designer couldn't have or wouldn't have done, and then you might have a scientific HYPOTHESIS.

267 posted on 02/17/2005 12:41:01 PM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN
There are ID'ers who are not Christian. They are few and far between, but they exist.

They're called Muslims and there are more than you indicate. Doesn't help you with his point.

273 posted on 02/17/2005 12:46:02 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson