Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MikeEdwards
I think that global warming is actually a nice way for governments to talk about Peak Oil without totally scaring the general public half to death. Climate change is 20 or 30 years off by most alarmists estimates, and probably always will be as the science is doubtful. Peak Oil is coming within the next ten years and the science is much solider based on production curves that have already reached their peak and have been observed in the U.S and throughout the world. What's worse is that there is no good solution to the peak oil crisis and it will probably lead to world war III.

Enter global warming. This allows people to demand energy efficiency and non-fossil fuel polluting energy sources without causing undue panic. What's more it lets the world put pressure on the U.S to consume less energy so that the oil will last longer, or at least they'll benefit from the remaining stocks.

8 posted on 02/15/2005 9:01:44 AM PST by Odyssey-x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Odyssey-x

Since I am in the oil business, I say your "peak Oil" is a joke.

Known reserves in the USA alone can provide fuel for over 100 years without going to any extensive lifting approaches.

I read a study once that noted 52% of people had no idea where their gas comes from and 92% have no idea where the plastic that wraps their loaf of bread comes from. The source is the same oil well.

Oil is used in everything we make from paint to computers not just gasoline. People really need to get a like. Peak Oil BTW noted in 1970 that all the oil would be gone by now as well.


9 posted on 02/15/2005 9:09:39 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Odyssey-x

Na, I don't buy into that peak oil scare either. Russia and Canada alone are sitting on top of huge reserves that have yet to be tapped. Plus there are many other lush reserves yet to be explored.
plus, as the world turns, we become more energy efficient, and discover better, or more efficient energy sources, or possibilities which, as technology advances, will become available, all of these reducing demand on oil reserves.

Maybe we should be buiding the big hydro electric dams while the sea level is low, so when this big wall of water comes from melting arctic ice, we can generate electricity with it.
If Science is wrong (which it is) we will have a very pretty sea wall which cost way too much money to build. maybe they could still be used as a tourist site, a glowing example of man's stupidity.


11 posted on 02/15/2005 9:12:24 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson