Posted on 02/14/2005 12:32:30 AM PST by RWR8189
The woman could not be put to death by those who had committed the same sin. Adultery remained a capital crime.
As you wish
Now I know how Rumsfeld felt about what the MSM media did with his remarks about armored vehicles in Iraq! LOL.
I would like you to explain to yourself, without lying if you can, Numbers 25:10-13.
That's a novel contribution to the separation of church and state debate.
And of course they have to have prey.
The spice must flow.
I thought that about Cheney.
They would tend to set an example that is hard to follow.
I believe that "gays" are made....not born.
From a spiritual standpoint, it doesn't matter if someone is born that way. Most men are born with the desire to have sex with a number of different women, but God doesn't condone that behavior either.
Obviously not. (Indians? What the hell...?)
Well, Keyes recently posted a very unflattering article about President Bush, written by that nut Charles Baldwin (the same article that was too much for FreeRepublic and pulled here, by the way), on his Renew America website...so it would seem Maya isn't the only one who can be critical of "a sitting President in time of war".
You want to talk about what's not proven by science? Genetic homosexuality comes to mind ... After all these years and years of research, and all the PC pressure, nobody has found a "gay gene" yet.
Oh, I see you are skilled in using the effective Gay-stapo rhetorical tool, the "You hate meeeee!" offense. That may work on some, but not me.
Who said that Alan Keyes 'hates' his daughter besides you? Did she say so? What constitutes 'hate'? Failing to abandon your deeply-held convictions and principles because someone close to you rejects them? It is to laugh.
Anti-gay conservatives say gays should go straight. But then when one does, you attack him anyway. You should be performing certain (purely platonic) acts on him in gratitude for his rejection of the homosexual lifestyle.
What in the world are you talking about? No one with any credibility has ever said that Ron the Lesser has ever had carnal knowledge of a male -- just that he acts like someone who has!
I would really like to know where you got this notion that R. Prescott Reagan is an "ex-gay," since everything that comes out of the guy's mouth indicates that he would have no problem embracing the homo lifestyle rather than rejecting it! The former First Twerp wears his atheism on his sleeve more than anyone I can think of besides Michael Newdow -- why would he be reluctant to use gayness as yet another loogie in the face of his adopted brother Michael, a flamboyant Christian?
Pardon me -- I meant William "Pete" Knight, the father of the Knight Initative (Proposition 22), which codified marriage as one man/one woman in California.
Every time I look in the mirror...
But homosexuals have very little impact on the lives of heterosexuals beyond a very tangential way. Homosexuals are pretty much irrelevant. Like any group of folks their are vacuous radical homosexuals who wish to translate their status into " opression and victimization". Much like there are vacuous radical heterosexuals who would be all too willing to fullfill the radical homosexuals expectations.
Well, just because the Gays latched onto the Civil Rights movement, doesn't make teh comparison between gays and indians valid - maybe someday, when gays are shunted onto unwanted land, killed in large numbers, ripped off, sent to crappy boarding schools to change who they are, and discriminated against in every way imaginable, then maybe, maybe, someday we could compare the two... but not currently.
I don't understand either group.
Well, I don't pretend to understand gays... so...
And there would be a HUGE block of voters who didn't care how much the government spent because they paid no taxes. So it's a fair assumption we would be "absent budget cuts".
All one has to do is read pratically any thread on FR that deals with indians, and you'll find that indians, often enough, ARE still oppressed, discriminated against, and otherwise maligned. You should see and hear some of the stuff I've had said to me - imagine walking out of a grocery store, and some dickhead is handing out "Rules for Indian Hunting Season" - pretty sick if you ask me. An American Indian girl in Idaho was scalped by some white kids just a few months ago, because she was "disrespectful"... That's the kind of stuff Indians still face in society TODAY. It's not okay when it's against blacks, orientals, or gays or anyone else, but it is still acceptable in this day and age to hate indians, and discriminate against them. No outcries, no uproars, no nothing. Just "Whatever, they got casinos, so screw 'em..."
The reality is the AIM movement doesn't represent all Indians. Nor does the radical gay movement represent all homosexuals. Sorry if the analogy seemed strained to you.
AIM may not represent all Indians, but they represent some - and there is a valid reason they attract so many to their ranks...
You sound a bit uncertain about that.
</pun>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.