Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ancient_geezer

Thank you.


642 posted on 02/18/2005 8:50:59 AM PST by OHelix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies ]


To: OHelix
I'm completely in favor of having a national discussion on FairTax, but I'd be much more in favor of seeing it passed if, instead of recommending that states tack on additional sales taxes, they recommended the states raise revenue from a property tax on land value only.

AFT claims that homeowners will enjoy a ~23% jump in home value. As we have seen from the last few years, more credit, through artificially low interest rates, in the hands of more people has driven property values up, triggering fears of a real estate bubble. This NRST would do quite the same thing. While new construction might drop from ~$200/s.f. to ~$140/s.f., the land prices, which are the only things that appreciate anyway, will fly through the roof.

Since income from land sales isn't taxed, and there's otherwise no holding cost for land, we'll wind up with quite a few valuable lots being held on to, exacerbating sprawl and transportation issues.

With sprawl we spend more and more time commuting, farmers lose their farms to developers, and we all wind up losing in the end.

With a land value tax, we encourage valuable lands to be used, we recover public improvements, and our cities generally grow up rather than out, leaving the hinterlands to the farmers and those who'd rather be alone.

Such a tax reduces our need for foreign oil by condensing population centers, allows us to produce our own foodstuffs, and actually increases the lands available for intensive development, for manufacturing, etc.

Consider this: to open a new factory, you generally need to buy or lease the land from the current landowner. If the landowner must pay an annual tax on the land value, he'll sell for less. In fact, the owner will sell less by approximately the present value of future taxes, so the buyer winds up paying the same, just less in cash, and more in future taxes. This requires less credit, so more credit is available to purchase capital. Because land is less valuable for a purely speculative investment, more land is available for productive use.
644 posted on 03/21/2005 7:13:57 PM PST by Eoin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson