To: Beckwith
a. To prevent the destruction of the Constitution of the United States by liberal judges. b. To oppose the normalization of the gay lifestyle. I most humbly submit that you do not get it. Republicans aren't defined by what we are against, but rather on the proactive policies we support. In a nutshell we stand for a better, stronger, safer, more prosperous America, for all Americans, even homosexuals. We're a pretty neat bunch.
89 posted on
02/13/2005 4:14:14 AM PST by
Melas
To: Melas
a. To prevent the destruction of the Constitution of the United States by liberal judges. b. To oppose the normalization of the gay lifestyle.
I most humbly submit that you do not get it. Republicans aren't defined by what we are against, but rather on the proactive policies we support. In a nutshell we stand for a better, stronger, safer, more prosperous America, for all Americans, even homosexuals. We're a pretty neat bunch.
First of all, I'm not a Republican. Your first mistake.
Second mistake. I get it, big time. And you can take that to the bank.
And I don't need any flower power, hippy speak for me. You can express your opinion in these forums and I shall do the same. I won't speak for you and don't you be so presumptious as to speak for me.
Your sensitivity to the homosexual lifestyle tells me all I need to know about you.
160 posted on
02/13/2005 6:03:15 AM PST by
Beckwith
(I know Churchill, and Ward Churchill is no Churchill . . . he ain't an Indian either . . .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson