Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rokke

Let's give MD4BUSH a chance to defend himself before we jump to any conclusions about who he is. He very well may have posted the full exchange in order to make sure it was available here when the WaPo selectively quoted from it. (As I'm writing this, MD4BUSH's account has been suspended, so this might not happen).

The underlining of incriminating passages is admittedly suspicious. The first Freepmails were posted on a now pulled thread at 11:05PM on 2/8. The underlining was put in a response to that same thread at 11:13PM on 2/8.


84 posted on 02/10/2005 11:37:03 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: conservative in nyc

He's dead, that thread is pulled..but the deed is done...Nobody knows WHO is on the internet unless you have personally met them...


90 posted on 02/10/2005 11:42:23 PM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc
"He very well may have posted the full exchange in order to make sure it was available here when the WaPo selectively quoted from it."

If he did that, he didn't tell NCPAC he was going to do it. More importantly, he didn't post the full exchange. He only posted what NCPAC said. The only possible excuse he might have is that someone got access to his FreeRepublic account and did things without him knowing. If that is true, it should be possible to track from where his last posts were made.

102 posted on 02/10/2005 11:48:26 PM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson