Skip to comments.
Prince Charles to wed Camilla Parker Bowles
Daily Telegraph news alert ^
Posted on 02/10/2005 1:15:47 AM PST by tjwmason
No story yet on their web-page, but a text-message news-alert from the Telegraph states that H.R.H. the Prince of Wales is to marry Camilla Parker Bowles.
See The Telegraph web-site for updates http://www.telegraph.co.uk
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: princeofwales
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: Dog
I'll be damned ....he is finally doing it. Interesting enough, though, Chuckie won't be doing it with a religious service. The future head of the C of E is going to have a civil service, with the Archbishop of Canterbury there to provide a blessing at the end.
21
posted on
02/10/2005 4:14:01 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
To: GraceCoolidge
Common interests, companionship, and friendship are most definately important in a marriage. I never said they weren't. Not that Charles and Camilla care what I think of them, but I find the two of them most repulsive simply for the way they carried on while Diana and Charles were married.
22
posted on
02/10/2005 4:14:06 AM PST
by
Arpege92
(Mr. Kerry, you are a jerk!" - Pat Sajak)
To: Dog
. . . doing it. Doing what, living in sin? Before they're married? No way!?
To: leadpenny
The real question is, aside from the obvious financial benefits to Bowles, what difference does any of this make? In the real world, that makes as much difference as Earl Barlow planning to we Martha Sanders.
To: leadpenny
It'll be a morganatic marriage. If Chuckie becomes king, she won't become queen. She'll be a princess consort. Her title will be HRH, the Dutchess of Somthing-or-Other.
25
posted on
02/10/2005 4:16:06 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
To: tjwmason
26
posted on
02/10/2005 4:16:45 AM PST
by
maggief
To: Rose of Sharn
And they would be . . . ? :)
To: leadpenny
Doing what, living in sin? Before they're married? No way!?LOL. As Steve Doocy put it this morning, the two of them have been mansioning up.
28
posted on
02/10/2005 4:17:33 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
To: tjwmason
Charles figures he'll never be King so he might as well spend the rest of his life in bliss with a commoner. He got tired of hanging around to sit on the throne.
Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News."
29
posted on
02/10/2005 4:23:16 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: mewzilla
Like during the 2004 prez campaign, someone said "Kerry was going to open a carafe of Whoopass!"
To: Arpege92
Charles has been commited to Camilla. It's kinda sad, he always loved her.
And please don't believe all the hype about Princess Diana. She wasn't a saint.
31
posted on
02/10/2005 4:32:38 AM PST
by
LauraleeBraswell
(Forgive Russia, Ignore Germany, Punish France - Condoleezza Rice)
To: PilloryHillary
Did you search? There are about 3 threads on this already.
Did you take you head out from up your backside? No, I didn't think so.
The first thread was posted as I was writing this one (i.e., after I had checked), this was the second.
32
posted on
02/10/2005 4:34:36 AM PST
by
tjwmason
(For he himself has said, and it's greatly to his credit, he remains an Englishman.)
To: tjwmason
"Did you take you head out from up your backside? No, I didn't think so."
I asked a simple question without being disrespectful. Please use your low-life gutter talk on someone else.
33
posted on
02/10/2005 4:39:40 AM PST
by
PilloryHillary
(Can vegetarians eat animal crackers?)
To: PilloryHillary
I asked a simple question without being disrespectful.
Yeah, right, whatever.
Please use your low-life gutter talk on someone else.
And you can use your righteous indignation on somebody else too.
If you don't want to read a thread don't click on it. Breaking news (which this was at quarter past 9 when this was posted) has a great tendancy to produce multiple threads for pretty obvious reasons.
34
posted on
02/10/2005 4:45:14 AM PST
by
tjwmason
(For he himself has said, and it's greatly to his credit, he remains an Englishman.)
To: tjwmason
Yeah, right, whatever. Don't ever post to me again, guttermouth.
35
posted on
02/10/2005 4:49:09 AM PST
by
PilloryHillary
(Can vegetarians eat animal crackers?)
To: PilloryHillary
Yeah, right, whatever. Don't ever post to me again, guttermouth.
Shock horror, there's a new thread on this topic. How ever will you cope.
36
posted on
02/10/2005 4:53:09 AM PST
by
tjwmason
(For he himself has said, and it's greatly to his credit, he remains an Englishman.)
To: tjwmason
Shucks it appears to have been deleted, what a close shave.
37
posted on
02/10/2005 4:55:03 AM PST
by
tjwmason
(For he himself has said, and it's greatly to his credit, he remains an Englishman.)
To: leadpenny
Earl is a farmer that lives about 7 miles north of me, and Martha is a school teacher that lives about 3 miles west of here.
To: Rose of Sharn
Oh, THAT Earl and Martha! Of course, it's been in all the papers. How could I forget? :)
Think I'll emigrate to Greenland for the next two months.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
