Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeLawStudent
I've never particularly been a hockey fan, so I don't really have a dog in the hunt. I have to believe that there are some serious monetary problems with hockey. Giving up an entire year's profits AND risking the survival of the league is a big step. If they're risking this, it's probably because their current economic model isn't working.

Hockey, unlike football, has never pulled the television ratings to get a big contract. For the NFL, the ratings are high enough to guarantee big money, and the stadiums hold significantly more people.

48 posted on 02/09/2005 7:46:05 PM PST by Richard Kimball (It was a joke. You know, humor. Like the funny kind. Only different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Richard Kimball

I agree that the current model is not working for them, but that doesn't mean that every system except a salary cap will not work. The salary cap is the most socialistic model ever discussed in sports.

As I said, the players have proposed some innovative ideas that would place some serious limits on spending (unlike MLB limits that don't deter George Steinbrenner). Moreover, the players were willing to take a 25% pay cut across the board, and then were going to agree to spending limits on top of that.

There is still a lot of money to be made in hockey. It does not approach anywhere near the level football does, but that does not mean it cannot function w/o a salary cap. The television contract is not as big, but they do take in more money in ticket revenue. (although stadium capacity is 1/3, they have 41 v. 8 home games per year + comparable ticket prices)


66 posted on 02/09/2005 8:41:26 PM PST by ConservativeLawStudent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson