To: Rutles4Ever
Man is literally creating monsters. This is off the charts. Whatever your feelings about this procedure, the child created by it would not be a "monster."
18 posted on
02/09/2005 1:51:25 PM PST by
Modernman
(What is moral is what you feel good after. - Ernest Hemingway)
To: Modernman
Whatever your feelings about this procedure, the child created by it would not be a "monster."The article referenced "artificial" sperm and eggs.
Yes, it would be a monster.
28 posted on
02/09/2005 1:58:30 PM PST by
cspackler
(There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
To: Modernman
If a human being - heck - any living creature - is the product of male and female DNA, then how do you classify this? Is there any creature in the world that can reproduce in a homosexual relationship? It's not even human sperm - it's synthetic.
32 posted on
02/09/2005 2:04:21 PM PST by
Rutles4Ever
(This is my tagline.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson