I would say yes. I can't imagine Congress or any state legislature allowing this type of contract.
Would the imposition of steritlity of offspring be the same as indentured servitude, since the child will have to return to the patent holder?
Yes. I can't imagine Congress or any state legislature allowing this type of contract, either.
All this brought to us by the homo-lobby in order to ensure the public sees two men playing with each other's penis as normal.
In all fairness, this type of procedure could be used by straight couples where one member of the couple is infertile.
Straigt couples will not have to turn female cells into male gentic material or vice versa. A natuaral born male and female has the sperm and egg which can be harvisted for invitro.
Government will not involve itself in such patent/mandatory sterility contracts (they already allow such dead end seeds in agriculture)
IF, and that is a big if, functional accessory babies will be produced before the laws catch up.
Regardless, this is a spin article to support homosexual "normalization". The science is not there if ever will be.