Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phantom Lord

Government does legitimately have that power. Otherwise, we would have the right to go nude anywhere we want.

The question is, "Where to draw the line?" Most agree total nudity in public areas is too much.

I don't care if someone's underwear is peeping out - but I HAVE seen teenagers who were wearing pants with half or more of their butt crack showing - in a McDonalds. That was repulsive.

Should it have been illegal? Don't know...I would as soon see a law preventing the sale of spandex in clothes above a certain size, or a requirement that bare midriffs only be allowed if there are no rolls of fat showing.

Unwise law? Perhaps.

Unconstitutional? No.


41 posted on 02/09/2005 1:38:27 PM PST by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
Should it have been illegal? Don't know...I would as soon see a law preventing the sale of spandex in clothes above a certain size, or a requirement that bare midriffs only be allowed if there are no rolls of fat showing.

I hope you're kidding. Do you really love the nanny state that much?

42 posted on 02/09/2005 1:41:56 PM PST by Modernman (What is moral is what you feel good after. - Ernest Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson