Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shubi
Uh huh, but individuals don't count in evolution, only populations.

That's true when the changes are just allele changes. It's also true when genes are inserted or copied within existing chromosomes. But somewhere along the line, chromosomes are duplicated or fused or whatever, changing the count. Otherwise, common descent is invalid.

There are (at least) two possible scenerios when this happens: one is that it happens frequently enough within a population that the "new" types find mates; the second possibility is that sometimes this just isn't an absolute barrier to reproduction.

967 posted on 02/09/2005 6:15:58 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 962 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

If a chromosome split in half and had the same genetic material, you are probably right. There would not be much of a barrier to reproduction.


1,017 posted on 02/09/2005 9:23:09 AM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 967 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson