"I've been questioning the science. I question the science and the methods used to support the idea of evolution. I've been saying that there are a lot of things still unexplained by science, so many things that I don't see why evolution has been widely accepted as more than a hypothesis."
What data do you have that supports a questioning of evolution? What methods do you specifically find fault with?
Science will never fully explain anything. That is why it is so interesting. Your insistence on perfection is absurd.
The reason evolution is a theory is it contains many supported hypotheses. It is predictive of new discoveries. It is the foundation of all biology.
You can question evolution all you want, but until you come up with data that supports your doubts, it is all meaningless.