I said evidence, not proof. You have given no evidence. You haven't given any proof either. All you have given is opinion, feeling or hunch.
I was simply trying to point out the difference between scientific evidence and the Bravo Sierra most creationists expound.
I have several evidences for God. One is the phrase "let there be light" in Genesis. This is an indication that Genesis is divinely inspired, as simple bronze age people would not know about E=mc2 or the Big Bang. This type of "predictive" passage is similar to what scientific theories allow us to do.
To me, science is confirmation of God's existence. To try to convince creationists that the Big Bang or conversion of mass and energy is evidence for God is like pulling teeth.
The biggest evidence for God is Christ's Resurrection. Any Christian that does not put that on the list, is not much of a Christian.
I do not need scientific evidence to know there is a God, all that is required is Faith. Humans are able to have this, animals and plants are not.
Seems to me that any Christian who would measure how much of a Christian another Christian is sincerely human. Although I do not doubt that Christ had risen, I do not see the evidence of this, don't need to, so it's not on the list. Many things on not on the list that could be.