[shubi]

If it was peer reviewed under SOP, no one would be objecting to the publishing of the article.

[WildTurkey]

If it was peer reviewed under SOP, no one would be objecting to the publishing of the article.

Notice that his link said the "reviewers" were unnamed.

[Tribune7]

If it was peer reviewed under SOP, no one would be objecting to the publishing of the article.

A. It appears to have been peer reviewed under SOP

B. Credentialed people are objecting

Now, isn't safe to conclude that these credentialed people are emotionally reacting to a challenge to deeply held beliefs?