Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: King Prout

Last I checked, Mitochondrial DNA studies confirmed that thee was a single woman we came from, too

Care to explain that?

Remember, as an Evolutionist, you cant use GENESIS.


1,214 posted on 02/09/2005 7:24:00 PM PST by RaceBannon ((Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1208 | View Replies ]


To: RaceBannon

Sorry: you checked wrong.

It is a great pity if you are foolish enough to consider Discovery Channel the epitome of genetic science.

a clue for you: Discovery Channel has the execrable habit of making oversimplified overstatements going far beyond what the data will support, purely in the hunt for ratings.

the remains of a woman were found in north africa.
the remains were dated by measuring carbon radioisotope levels. If I recall correctly, the age of the remains was found to be around 20,000 years (that's a bit of an if: been a while since I reviewed the data on this specimen, and my memory is not perfect... however, I am quite certain the date was significantly older than a mere 6,000 years).
the bones contained some mitochondrial DNA fragments.
Some of those fragments are found in the mitochondrial DNA in all modern humans.

now, do you realise that it is entirely possible that this so-called "Eve" had NOT ONE DESCENDANT?

think about it.

HINT1: inheritance of mitochondria is entirely matrilineal
HINT2: mitochondrial DNA mutates very slowly
HINT3: "Eve's" great-great-great-great-great-great-grandmother had the same mitochondrial DNA that "Eve" herself did.

Think about it.
I mean, really, for once on this thread, THINK.


1,219 posted on 02/09/2005 7:38:33 PM PST by King Prout (Remember John Adam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1214 | View Replies ]

To: RaceBannon
Remember, as an Evolutionist, you cant use GENESIS.

Who are you to say? Did God sign over a copyright to you or something?

1,223 posted on 02/09/2005 7:46:17 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1214 | View Replies ]

To: RaceBannon

Single woman, single man; lived 200,000 years apart. There's a simple mathematical explanation (which I will post again.)

The number of mothers at any time is smaller than the number of daughters. (Fathers and sons mutatis mutandis.) Moving back into time, the number of mothers's mothers is still smaller. The limit is one. This does not mean that only one person existed at that time, only that all the other mothers's offspring (in the propertiy being measured) died off.

The same thing happens to names and sons. It's called the least recent common ancestor phenomenon.


1,252 posted on 02/09/2005 9:28:34 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson