Replies

To: shubi

It wasn't a science paper. It was just the same old sophist argument with no new science or any basis in science.

Okaaaay. Now, let's return to my question. How was the peer-review process violated?

1,193 posted on 02/09/2005 6:38:18 PM PST by Tribune7

To: Tribune7

Peer review is supposed to check the science. There wasn't any. It should never have been published.

What is difficult to understand about that?

1,196 posted on 02/09/2005 6:45:50 PM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794