It wasn't a repressed memory. He was not coached by a counselor to "remember" these acts then reported these acts after that. His memories of the rapes came back when he was told of Shanley's arrest and went to a counselor within 12-15 hours with these memories. "Repressed memories" was the defense theory of the case.
"His memories of the rapes came back when he was told of Shanley's arrest and went to a counselor within 12-15 hours with these memories."
How could there not be reasonable doubt that these momries were wrong?