Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BobL

Good lord. Read the entire exchange, and don't just cherry-pick a few lines you think make your point.

Transcript:

THE PRESS: Mr. Lopez, in looking at the proposal, are you planning on having any type of non-compete clause for future expansion of I-35 in order to attract as much traffic as possible to the Trans-Texas Corridor 35?

MR. LOPEZ: I guess this is more a question for the Commission or the officers of the state. What I can answer to you is that in our -- in the terms of engagement that have been presented to the would-be winner, there's no restriction on -- or there's no limit to competition from existing roads or no limit to other roads being built and things like that.

(Translation, the Cintra rep says there would be no restriction on competition.)

Transcript Continued:

THE PRESS: Including expansions from four lanes to six, or --

MR. WILLIAMSON: Well, let me answer that question, while also asking Tony's question.

We're on the record, Ben and Tony, as you know, of saying we fully expect that there will be limitations on our ability, at some point in the future, to compete with the road he is going to spend his money on and pay us for. We believe that profit is a decent and honorable pursuit and that for him to pay his franchise taxes in Texas, he's going to have to generate some profits.

We're not afraid of that. He offers to take us out of the risk business in offering an alternative corridor parallel to 35, and he offers us cash in exchange for that.

Now, it will be up to Commissioner Nichols and Commissioner Houghton, Ben, to see to it that staff stays within certain Commission guidelines. Among that, I'm sure, are be sure we can expand 35 to six lanes the entire length of the highway.

But all of our decisions, you have to remember, are made, not in the context of what would you like to do, Commission, but what do you have the cash to do.

And the reality, Patrick, is we don't have the money to expand Interstate 35 much bigger than six lanes. It's not -- we're in a different position than, say, the California legislature a few years ago when the Orange County issue came up. They were flush with cash and could have done a lot of things. We don't have that luxury.

As you saw from the presentation ahead of the layout, which we put out there for you to look at, Gordon, we don't have the cash to go expand Interstate 35 much beyond six lanes. So it's really not much of a consideration for us.

But even if it is, these guys are willing to build it for the taxpayers of the state so that we don't have to raise their taxes, pay us additional cash so we can consider some things we might not have considered, and for that, they need to have an expectation they can generate a profit, and we shouldn't be ashamed of that.

(Translation, Williamson says TxDOT is not afraid to compete with Cintra, they plan to expand the entire length of I-35 to six lanes, and while they would like to do more, the only limitation on them is the resources they have available for expansion beyond 6 total lanes, which would be a HUGE improvement.)


126 posted on 02/07/2005 1:23:54 PM PST by guschat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: guschat
"Translation, Williamson says TxDOT is not afraid to compete with Cintra, they plan to expand the entire length of I-35 to six lanes, and while they would like to do more, the only limitation on them is the resources they have available for expansion beyond 6 total lanes, which would be a HUGE improvement."

Again, we don't know that, since the negotiations are SECRET. Cintra (and Ontario, for that matter), at minimum, deceived the people of Canada by making them think that Ontario retained ultimate control over toll rates. The Canadians learned the hard way that were fooled, and now Cintra is free to charge whatever they want.

Also (I feel like a broken record), Do your really think that Cintra would leave the future of I-35 totally under the control of Texas - where, if Texas could find the money (and the room, in some cases) - Texas could add 3 lanes to I-35, making it 5 lanes each way, and totally wipe out Cintra's $7.2 Billion investment. Cintra is not that stupid - although the people in Austin appear to be really stupid.

As to anything that Mr. Lopez might say - it means NOTHING. What matters is what's signed.


(now I'll quote myself - to make a point)


"Texas could add 3 lanes to I-35"

(typically toll road supporter): Yea, right pal. Just WHERE do you think Texas would get that kind of money?


(my answer): Texans will be so angry at Perry (hopefully out of office by then) and Cintra, that they will demand punishment. And the best way to provide that punishment is to expand I-35. Now, if Kay gets elected because of these toll-road scams, Kay would have a serious mandate to raise the gas tax and punish Cintra - if she chose to do so.

Far out, maybe. But it is this possibility that REQUIRES that Cintra be protected against any new competition. And again, that's what makes it the business of the "little people".
128 posted on 02/07/2005 4:11:40 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson