Non-predictive. It still didn't answer my proposal in post 352.
Before you accuse me of being a closet Creationist, I would inform you that Creationism is bunk. It is definitely due to insecure people trying to justify a mindset.
I am interested in science. If you want to accuse me as an epistemologist ( as they would at talk.origins ) and leave it at that, fine. I've been partaking in beer this evening and am rather grumpy.
But, wouldn't science be better served at understanding the mechanism, than pursuing grants?
I was merely giving you some examples of selective pressure leading to speciation. I assumed you'd see the 'predictability' inherent in my rather simplistic statements. Dog breeders (and more) and microbiologists alike are successfully predicting evolutionary outcome as a matter of day-to-day business.