You posted on this thread, so why are you lying about this? You simply have no moral integrity at all, and don't even mind getting caught. For the record, Darwin's daughter is mentioned in all major biographies, and was the subject of quite a bit of back and forth on the Escape From God thread.
That post was the very first time I had heard about Annie.
My comments since then refer to the fact that after all these years, my 'exposure' to evolution is one that has been quite controlled. The parts that are nice, those get published and put out.
The stuff that is not convenient to Darwinists, it is omitted from the discussion. My point is this: why is it only on FreeRepublic that I learned about this stuff? Why is it that the shaded deliverance of evolution is tolerated?