It is sad to watch so many voters voting on some basis, other than qualification. Religion, race, sex, looks, you name it. Sad decision making.This is an ignorant comment. My religious beliefs invariably inform my view of a man’s qualifications. It is no different than for those who are atheistic, whatever. Their moral and/or theological views invariably impact how they select office holders.
I would agree with you that race, sex, and looks are not appropriate. However, to compare choosing a candidate based on his having a better haircut, with my choosing a candidate because his pro-life stance matches my (faith taught) view that all human life has worth, is asinine.
Keep in mind, that the polls prove that voters didn’t vote just based on a shell of religion, e.g., the Catholics didn’t vote for Kerry simply because he is a Catholic, but rather they chose a politician whose political stances fit with their beliefs: religious, social, moral, and economic. In that light, religious views are entirely appropriate in politics, and in some cases are inseperable.
patent
This is an ignorant comment.
======
No it isn't. But you can call it what you want, that is your opinion. I do not feel that any President should be selected based on religous beliefs, and that is my opinion. Competence, experience, credibility, honesty, support of the Constitution and founding principles of this country, and commitment to the safety and well being of the people of this country rank fare above all else.
We all have our opinions -- and I promise not to call your opinion "ignorant".