I thank you for your correction. I had proceeded under the assumption that EVEN IF there is homosexual behavior in nature, that doesn't require that human homosexual behavior be tolerated. The fact that something is "natural" (such as disease) certainly lead to the conclusion that it is acceptable or valuable.
thanks again
You're welcome. I got the gist of your earlier statement and I, too, strongly disagree with the erroneous argument that 'homosexuality is "natural" since it allegedly occurs in the animal kingdom.'