But sorry to be so ornery with you.
We all mix it up on Free Republic and have geat fun 'cause the peple are great!
It is a strong personal preference of mine and I would certainly not have a problem with anyone who chose not to practice this procedure.
Sorry also for misspelling FGM.
I'm also a member of the DNA---National Dyslexic Association. :)
If, through this forum, I can convince one prospective parent of a male baby to think twice about this procedure, I will be happy. You and many males today have been circumcised. The education and research is now out about the value of a foreskin. What isn't there, isn't missed, but from what I have read, men who have never had this procedure have more sensitivity, etc.
That is secondary, though, to the horror stories out there about infections, deformities, and worse of little innocent babies because of an unnecessary procedure. Rare, yes, but one is too many.
No argument here....I will not change my opinion. The facts are there for anyone wishing to do the research. With education and time, the pendulum will swing back to the majority of men NOT being circumcised.