Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: missyme; longtermmemmory

Even when they are in violation of state law, these homosexual organizations are well protected.

You'd have to read the whole thread ( http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/837855/posts ) to get the picture, but here are a few replies that will shed some light on why:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/837855/posts?page=19#19

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/837855/posts?page=136#136

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/837855/posts?page=297#297


41 posted on 02/02/2005 11:55:20 AM PST by EdReform (Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: EdReform

Thanks for the enlightening links.

The problem is that we need a Chief prosecutor with the intestinal fortitude to take these jokers to court.

Event the ACLJ might be able to bring suit with a representative parental plaintiff, but that would require the MSM to be able to show the explicit details of these try-recreational-sex programs.


44 posted on 02/02/2005 12:56:40 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson