I believe that Greer has said that Michael's side showed "clear and convincing" evidence, and the 2nd DCA agreed. Furthermore, he reiterated it in his decision the other day (Friday, 2/11/05).
That is still out of align of the other states decisions and conflicts the the USSC decision. It is worthy.
1,192 posted on 02/13/2005 7:28:00 PM PST by bjs1779
(“I don’t want anyone trying to feed that girl”, Greer thundered from the bench in 2001.)
So how does it get changed? Doesn't the FL Supreme Court have to agree to look at the case?
1,193 posted on 02/13/2005 7:53:16 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)