They quit the debate because they realized they were dealing with a moron.
Believe me, no one was "disarmed" by the author's comparing homosexuality to a duckling "imprinting" on a human, rendering it forever "stunted" in its growth to mature duckhood.
Of course, this could be intended as satire on imbecile arguments, in which case forgive me for not getting the humor right away.
"They quit the debate because they realized they were dealing with a moron."
Hmm, Just as the author described. You respond to the argument with insults, then retreat.
It is common sense that people who are not attracted to members of the opposite sex but are attracted to the same sex have a serious disorder (even if they don't recognize it.) They shouldn't be discriminated against but neither should it be celebrated or considered normal.
snip...Believe me, no one was "disarmed" by the author's comparing homosexuality to a duckling "imprinting" on a human, rendering it forever "stunted" in its growth to mature duckhood.
Unless you were there, then your words are nothing but resentment-laced hot air. And if you're unable to speak the truth, then don't speculate. Had you been among the cadre of activist 'gays' in that thread, then believe me......you were disarmed.
Your name calling, makes you irrelevant.
If they thought the speaker was a moron they don't understand homosexuality. If you buy the 'when did you decide to become heterosexual' trap then you might need to study the issue more.
Shalom.