Figures never lie.
Figurers often do.
A Process Model of Cambial Activity and Ring Structure in Conifers Using Daily Climatic Data
Is this even worth debating?
Someone mind telling me how Precipitation, Soil Moisture,
Sunlight (Photosynthesis),Atmospheric conditions, Water
stress, Transpiration, were accurately solved (over 1000
years) to show a deviation of .3 deg c?
There are too many unknown process variables.
I guess one could approximate each variable until the
results suited their purpose.
My guess is that they could not have solved the temperature
within +/- 3 deg c in the first place.
Simply put: There are too many variables and their
errors are cumulative when solving for one.
My guess is that they could not have solved the temperature
within +/- 3 deg c in the first place.
It's nothing but a communist/socialist power grabbing lie.
Now give us all your industry, intellectual property
rights, and your energy. We will make peaceful global
socialist government to rule over you peasants. Any one
who disagrees we make disappear.
*snicker*
Model Limitations:
Is only a beginning of modeling cambial activity,
development of wood structure and ring growth.
Is limited by current knowledge and experience in
constructing mathematical equations that are adequate to
describe the real processes governing growth.
Approximates many parameters and processes that have yet
to be validated with field measurements and controlled
experiments.
Applies primarily to dendrochronologically dated tree
rings that have been limited by variations in climate.