Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 26lemoncharlie
THe Fems are getting what they deserve!!! They wanted to Feminize everything, GOOD FOR THEM!!

I'm glad that this is such a joke to you. "They wanted to Feminize everything", I have no idea what that means. Think of it this way though. If homosexuality is no longer immoral than males could be forced to work in whore houses also, to service the male homosexuals. Is that funny to you?

23 posted on 01/29/2005 8:43:50 PM PST by MontanaBeth (NEVER FORGET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: MontanaBeth

I'm assuming that their new law is Politically Correct and would include males too.

I wonder what the males will do when forced into homosexual prostitution?


30 posted on 01/29/2005 8:46:06 PM PST by katnip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: MontanaBeth

That's what the Feminazi's want!! They want to become Priests, they even wanted to do away with Urinal's!!!

Who do you think is behind and along side the Homosexual Push in this country!! You better WAKE UP my friend!! Our Country is being torn to shreds!!

No this is not funny at all, what is funny is that we are allowing it to happen at all!

You certianly don't have to take my word for it.
Here, read for yourself:
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/hearings.asp?formmode=view&id=954


43 posted on 01/29/2005 8:53:24 PM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Sit nomen Dómini benedíctum,Ex hoc nunc, et usque in sæculum! per ómnia saecula saeculórum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: MontanaBeth
Feminism is nothing more to socialists than one means toward socialist government. After socialist gangs install a dictatorship, all pretenses (especially divorce and cohabitation laws) are dropped/unenforced.

"Then it will be plain that the first condition for the liberation of the wife is to bring the whole female sex back into public industry, and that this in turn demands the abolition of the monogamous family as the economic unit of society" (Frederick Engels, "Origins of the Family, Private Property, and the State").

Mao's Little Red Book on Women
http://www.paulnoll.com/China/Documents/Mao-31-Women.html

Some of Lenin's words on women
http://www.marx.org/archive/lenin/works/1919/nov/06.htm

The following is from the "Manifesto of the Communist Party" (Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Fredrick Engels)
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm

"The bourgeois sees his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women."

He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.

For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce free love; it has existed almost from time immemorial."


“Everyone who knows anything of history also knows that great social revolutions are impossible without the feminine ferment. Social progress may be measured precisely by the social position of the fair sex (plain ones included)” (Karl Marx Letter to Ludwig Kugelmann, MECW, Volume 43, p. 184, http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1868/letters/68_12_12.htm)
122 posted on 01/30/2005 3:30:38 AM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson