great headline for the yellow press.
nothing more.
it is true that there is a "clue" in the law, but according to german articles the whole story is based on the assumption, that one could be forced to do such a job.
but, as the government does not offer such jobs, because it does not have such jobs, no one would be forced to do such a job.
how about thinking?
According to the article:
"Under Germany's welfare reforms, any woman under 55 who has been out of work for more than a year can be forced to take an available job – including in the sex industry – or lose her unemployment benefit.....
The government had considered making brothels an exception on moral grounds, but decided that it would be too difficult to distinguish them from bars. As a result, job centres must treat employers looking for a prostitute in the same way as those looking for a dental nurse."
Where in the article does it say that a woman is only coerced to take government jobs, when the above quote makes it clear it can be any job offered by a legal employer?
Try thinking yourself or presenting some facts instead of making unwarranted assertions.
Good greif.
Besides, it is the logical next step when you consider the European amorality and their tight budgets.
I wouldnt be surprised that they end up doing far worse and little twitters like you will shake their head and tell everyone they are being gullible, bah!