I'm uncertain why you pinged me. I'm not a creationist, I just think Darwins's theory of natural selection is almost certainly wrong. Assuming the changes in species over the millenia are due to alteration of DNA, the theory of many random mutations, competition (battle for the "survival of the fittest") and emergence of a dominant "winner" has very little support in the fossil record as the agent for that change in DNA. As one paleontologist once put it to me, we know that change has occurred, we just don't know yet what the change agent was. Your post really doesn't address this issue.
Space aliens?