[colorado tanker]

I agree with the first part of the article, that natural selection or its refinements don't explain the Cambrian explosion, random mutation just doesn't get it done based on what I've read.

On the other hand, I don't think it necessarily follows that the only other explanation is design by a creator, I'm open to that but it strikes me as an unproven hypothesis. The creation of new species could also be the result of a biological process we don't yet understand, it seems to me.

[mdmathis6]

"On the other hand, I don't think it necessarily follows that the only other explanation is design by a creator, I'm open to that but it strikes me as an unproven hypothesis. The creation of new species could also be the result of a biological process we don't yet understand, it seems to me."

Must have been the MONOLITH(Cuing organ, trumpets and Richard Straus's Thus Sprach Zarathustra)!

[Last Visible Dog]

On the other hand, I don't think it necessarily follows that the only other explanation is design by a creator, I'm open to that but it strikes me as an unproven hypothesis. The creation of new species could also be the result of a biological process we don't yet understand, it seems to me.

Well put!

It drives me crazy how freeper darwinists claim everybody that questions darwinism is a "creationist"