Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
I see that, but I don't believe it. I know where the cosmological constant comes from. The field eqs are like diffeqs. They're tensor eqs, but the solutions always have the arbitrary constants arising, as in diffeqs, that must be evaluated. There is no truth to the statement that he "added" something in an arbitrary way to force some belief.

DeSitter's solution is a good fit to the present universe. The constant is zero to something like 55-100 decimal places.

466 posted on 01/29/2005 9:19:10 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets
"Einstein retracted Lambda in 1932."

He did not. It's still there and it's zero.

467 posted on 01/29/2005 9:22:39 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies ]

To: spunkets
I see that, but I don't believe it.

Fair enough.

But constants in differentials are dependent on boundry conditions if I remember correctly.

And whether or not a constant is requisite in todays cosmology says nothing about AE's state of mind does it?

469 posted on 01/29/2005 9:29:31 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson