We (Creationists) don't control peer-reviewed journals, YET! The only aspersions I am casting is toward comments like the ones quoted below. I can honestly say that I have never purposefully mislead anyone on this forum. I have apologized a number of times for misapprehending a fact, or what someone meant. But I have never tried to stifle someones opinion. That is what I consider unfair tactics by these Evolutionists.
"When the Biological Society of Washington issued its embarrassing apology for publishing the paper, the organization pledged that arguments for Intelligent Design 'will not be addressed in future issues of the Proceedings,' regardless of whether the paper passes peer review."
"'My conclusion on this,' McDiarmid said, 'was that it was a really bad judgment call on the editor's part.'"
P.S. I am not blaming anyone on this forum for stifling. It is why I so enjoy spending time here. We have a very open forum of discussion. general_re, I am not calling you a Brown Shirt, only that you are "sided" with what I consider Brown Shirts. You in no way have withheld my speech, and I hope to clarify that I was not making that claim. I sincerely apologize if it came across that way.
Well, I appreciate that, and for the record, I don't think you're a communist or whatever either. The funny part about these threads is that we all almost surely agree on far more than we disagree, but contentiousness must be in the blood or something, because we sure are good at it. ;)