First you have to have a tent. When ID has some testable hypotheses you can claim it is a science. Saying something that has already happened is improbable is not much of an intellectual accomplishment.
That WHAT has already happened? That man walks the earth, which is populated with countless animals and plants? We all agree on that.
ID is on par with Darwinism. The only real support for either one is based on the faith of its adherents. We can't prove that God created earth, but can only point at what we believe is consistent with that faith. Wait a minute . . . . I guess that changes my original statement, as you can't even do that.
I repeat my statement made on countless threads along this line. Darwinisn as a scientific theory was credible only when it was falsifiable. It could be falsified by the absence of transitional species in nature and the fossil record. That, my friend, has been accomplished in spades.
However, then the evolutionists changed the rules, with the silly "punctuated equilibrium." That is not falsifiable, and therefore there is no longer a viable scientific theory concerning evolution. That is why Nobel Prize winner Francis Crick (DNA), admitting evolution was no longer viable, suggested earth was seeded with life by aliens from outer space. You can call us names, but . . .
We creationists admit our belief is based on faith. Why can't you simply admit yours is, also?