[WildHorseCrash]

First -- before I frame my answer. Let me call you a series of highly unflattering and rude names, for I have sensed that is your desire. You sniveling twit, you pompous ass, you canker-infested glob of pus. There, is that staisfactory?

Ha ha ha. Whatever gets you off, junior.

Of course design infers intelligence. That is by its very definition. That is an intrinsic, inseperable part of what the term "design" means.

A non-random, yet intelligent action could create design. Look at the evolution of animals or the shapes of galaxies. Both show elements of design, but not intelligence. Snowflakes and ice crystals exhibit design, but, again, no intelligence in creating them.

[bvw]

Ha ha ha! You sniveling ass, you pompous glob of pus, you canker-infested twit. Ho ho ho!

Showing "elements of design" is not design. A regular pattern occuring in random processes is not design. It is a regular -- symetric or spiral, and such -- pattern. It is a pattern.

What makes it "design" to you?