Oh, really? And what do you based that likelihood on? Tea leaves? Goat entrails?
I don't know any such thing, and neither, I suspect, do you. And even if he has, Meyer himself is not exactly a neutral observer, now is he?
But then again, you are with the Brown Shirts; in one out the other.
When your "argument", such as it is, could have been lifted straight from the Code Pink playbook, you should probably take that as a sign that you're wandering off the reservation. "Brown shirts"? And what does that make you, if not an ideological clone of the left, willing to let bad science in because of how it makes you feel, rather than stand up for some sort of standards of scholarship? Touchy-feely, let's let it in regardless of how bad it is because it makes us feel all warm and fuzzy inside - please. Spare me.
Brown shirts, feh. Trust me - you don't want to go down that road, friend.
I backed up my claims with inflammatory quotes from those on your side; and you respond thusly. You may wish to recheck your feeling meter.
The Code Pink playbook doesn't permit straightforward quotes, they are to hard to twist. My point would have been just as powerful with only the quotes and without any comments from me. Always indicting. And yes, the context is easy to apprehend.