I have no idea how you inferred everything you ‘imagined’ I was saying from a post were I only asked “What?”
And I repeat, I actually think a formal equation is not (not…not…not…) necessary because logic is sufficient. I do not need an equation to know who my wife is nor do I believe that my wife merely is an elaborate differential equation. I have not calculated probability (specified complexity, coin tosses, poker hands, etc…) but you continue to insist that I am and then argue accordingly.
I'm glad to hear that you haven't personally done the calculations. You refer to them, if only indirectly, in your posts. ID cannot escape these probability calculations because they are are the only argument ID has.
You still haven't told me what logic you employed in deciding my image was a natural snowflake. Are you absolutely certain it isn't a photo of a Lucite snowflake? Would you bet your children's lives on it?