You ask questions and I answer… That’s how it works now and how it has worked in the past.
No, what you do is make assertions, and I ask probing questions. My questions are neither arbitrary nor unresponsive.
I am saying that arithmetic is not relevant unless the calculation is relevant to the problem under discussion.
The fact that you try to turn the argument away for verifiable evidence means you have no adequate response.
My original question was whether natural selection operates randomly, eliminating individuals at random. You know the answer to this question is dangerous, so you turn it aside with philosophical/theological responses. The question has a verifiable answer.