To: AlienandStranger
I was raised a Roman Catholic and I also read the Bible.
And John Kerry was an alter boy, so he understood everything about the Catholic faith...
There is no mention of separate, special "saints"- all Christians are called saints by Paul.
There's no mention of the Trinity, or even the word "Trinity." The New Testament speaks of the Father in heaven, Jesus as the Son of God, and a Paraclete, but no where does it suggest that all are three persons of the same being. This theology was not developed until centuries later. Yet, most "bible-only" Christians still believe in the Trinity...
There's no mention of "purgatory" or "limbo".
There is in a Catholic Bible, but Martin Luther thought it best to remove books such as 1 and 2 Maccabbees from the Old Testament.
You don't have to confess your sins to a priest
Jesus gave the Apostles the power to forgive other people's sins. If a Christian doesn't need someone ordained by God to forgive their sins, and they can just approach God themselves, then Jesus conferred upon them a useless power. Would Jesus do something completely arbitrary?
Mary is not equal with Jesus.
You are right. Catholic theology agrees.
nor do you need a "saint" to intervene for you when praying to God.
You've never asked a friend or family member to pray for you? That's intervention, isn't it? The difference with Catholic Saints is that these are our brothers and sisters already in complete union with God in heaven. Our God is a God of the living, not the dead.
No man is sinless
Except Jesus, unless you're resurrecting the Arian heresy and claiming Jesus wasn't a man
There are not different "kinds" of sins (original, venial, mortal); all sins are equal in God's eyes.
When Judas commits the sin of betrayal against the Son of God, Jesus says that it would have been better for him to have never been born. Yet, with other sins, such as prostitution or Peter's denial of Christ, Jesus is not nearly as harsh. Perhaps Jesus doesn't see sin the same way you do.
Mary didn't remain a virgin and needed a savior like everyone else.
That belief cannot be produced by Biblical exegesis only, as we run into complications with translations. In aramaic, the word means relatives of all sorts, not just pure blood line. Since we know Joseph was a widower prior to his betrothal to Mary we know that he most likely had children, which would have become Jesus' brothers and sisters without any formal destinction made in terminology. But, if you're only going to use the Bible, your argument will not go anywhere as there is not much to base that claim on.
The list goes on.
They always do..... :-)
To: mike182d
"The list goes on."
They always do..... :-)
Good work.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson