Posted on 01/25/2005 9:49:36 AM PST by missyme
Women outnumbered men in most primitive societies because young men performed the dangerous tasks; hunting, fighting, exploring for example.
It seems that polygamy would be a natural outcome of the imbalance. The imbalance apparently continued in Biblical times, as patriarchs are said to have had wives and concubines.
Sounds like fun at first, but no thanks! One is plenty for me.
There is ample representation of the practice, but not ample support. The definition of marriage is given in Genesis 3 as being one man and one woman becoming one flesh. Jesus validates that definition when asked to discuss Moses' law of divorce. Plural marriage is not outright condemned as is homosexual activity, but it is clearly not what G-d intended. Indeed, He taught the importance of faithfulness to your one wife when He rejected the offspring of Abraham and Hagar as being the seed of His promise.
Shalom.
"Whoaaaa missy.
"
Read on. She was quoting from a website, but forgot to mention it. That statement doesn't represent her point of view.
Is this any worse than gay marriages?It also involves force.From the article:
"Allen helped enact a child bigamy law in 2003 that made forced marriages of minors a second-degree felony punishable by one to 15 years in prison. Before, the offense carried only 30 days in jail, and was rarely enforced, Allen said. He said the marrying of teenage girls was a common practice among some of Utah's isolated polygamist communities until the state served notice it was cracking down. The book, written by Salt Lake City author Andrea Moore-Emmett, tells the stories of 18 women who claim they suffered rape, incest and violence in polygamous communities."
Yeah, that's worse.
There's no legal logic I can think of that can be twisted to allow gay marriage and not allow (voluntary) polygamy.
-Eric
more than one wife?....what an idiot.
How many wives did David have? The only time God was angered with him was when he slept with someone else's wife. What about concubines? And since you bring up marrying children, in my grandmother's day the view was completely different on what a "child" was. She told me if a girl was sixteen and not married yet people started calling her an old maid. Most girls were married by age fourteen. In Bible times it was viewed differently too. I have heard historians and theologans say that Mary was probably about 13 when she married Joseph, and Joseph had already been married and was a widower...he was around the age of seventy. I don't defend these views in today's times, it is just interesting how our views change over time.
Just like drinking alcohol. Kids drink wine overseas and no one thinks anything about it. The same happened back in Bible times. Jesus did drink. I think most people started viewing drinking as a sin after the prohibition here. Excessive drinking and eating were always considered sins, but a drink of wine wasn't.
Actually, the whole New Testament assumes one man and one woman. "The two shall become one"
"As long as the mariage is between two consenting adults, I don't have a problem with it. Worry about your own lives before you start worrying about others...la"
You have a young daughter?
Well, not to brag or anything, but if your spouse were me you would claim one was not enough of a good thing!
</fantasy mode>
Shalom.
"There is ample representation of the practice, but not ample support. "
Make no mistake: Plural marriages exist in the Bible, and are not condemned there. There would have been no reason to do so, because the practise was a commonplace.
The Bible makes things very clear that are condemned by the Biblical deity. Apparently, what is not condemned is permitted, since great kings like Solomon and David had multiple wives.
It may not have been put forward as the best practise, but is never condemned in the Bible.
Those who oppose plural marriage on Biblical grounds are using the wrong reference.
Why? Is the 17 year-old mature enough to make the decision or not?
I am not Pro-Polygamy????
I post many articles on Non-traditional Marraige issues floating around the planet...
"Actually, the whole New Testament assumes one man and one woman. "The two shall become one"
"
That's one way to look at it. However, that was not always the case in New Testament times. And multiple wives were never condemned in the New Testament. There's no indication that it was a sin to have multiple wives, although it was certainly a sin to commit adultery. The prohibition against polygyny came later.
MM..
I did post the website.
www.religionnewsblog.com
Missy,
Be sure to reference the source on these posts, to protect yourself. It's a good idea to paste a link to the source in the post. Otherwise, people will get the wrong idea.
They're working to lower the age of consent in Canada and California. Trying to get it to 14. All part of the plan. Ribit. Kinda warm, eh? Ribit.
Not in Message #5, you didn't. That's the one that seems like your own writing. I'm not on your case, here...I'm just trying to help you not to confuse people. Go back and look at #5 and pretend you didn't post it. It looks like the poster agrees with plural marriage.
You have to source every post you make, to avoid being misunderstood.
We're on different sides in most cases, but I have no malice toward you. I'm just trying to help.
I know of numerous men here with more than one wife.
Interestingly enough, the majority of women here accept it. It is something that has become ingrained in the culture to the point where it becomes normal.
Well they also thought it was normal to marry your realtives...
Frankly I think Autism, Schizoprehnics, and other inherited diseases proably came about from marrying and having children with close family members.
Do those men get to speak much at home?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.