Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EGPWS

If it isn't radioactive, it's probably the secondary loop, which is used to cool and condense the primary loop after it exits the turbines. Fermi #2 is a Boiling Water Reactor; Pressurized Water Reactors often have three or more loops, but the turbine loop is generally non-radioactive, which has definite benefits.


33 posted on 01/24/2005 11:11:40 PM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: HolgerDansk
So the leak wouldn't have any adverse effects because of loss of cooling?

I trust then that this is a coolant breach which wouldn't create a situation that over temp could cause a more serious situation?

Or is it a situation that could, but isn't an issue if taken care of in a timely fashion?

Thanks for the info my FRiend.

35 posted on 01/24/2005 11:34:54 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: HolgerDansk

Yes, I hear that it was the secondary loop----just the usual MSM blowing it out of proportion.

As for the BWR vs PWR--ANY steam that goes to the turbine or ancillary machiner is not radioactive.

Or at least it isn't supposed to be ;-)

BTW, has anyone accounted for Homer Simpsons whereabouts?


55 posted on 01/25/2005 11:39:02 AM PST by fastattacksailor (This tagline under serious consideration!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: HolgerDansk

In a BWR, like Fermi, there is no secondary loop. You're thinking of the condensers which cool the steam after it pases through the turbine. That happens in both PWRs and BWRs. In a BWR the steam goes directly from the reactor to the turbine. In a PWR design the steam from the reactor goes to a steam generator which flashes water on the secondary side to steam which then drives the turbine. You can have different amounts of loops with a PWR but they all go to steam generators which are the interface with the secondary side.

Even if you had a reactor coolant leak, it wouldn't be that big of a deal. The water gets pumped to the radwaste treatment system and processed. The leak at Fermi was from a support system that did not contain reactor coolant.


99 posted on 01/26/2005 2:48:33 PM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson