Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: scannell
>>>In the wildest hypothetical situation, if a psychic were able to concentrate on a crime and determine who the perp was, would you feel him doing so would be unconstitutional. (the exercise of his own talents). Is the same true if they could block terrorist activities that way? Depends on whether the psychic had probable cause and wasn't Ms. Cleo.


Of course, what we are arguing is whether the government, represented by police, is able to search your "effects" without justifiable cause. It wouldn't matter what a psychic saw, unless he was someway connected to the law, and even DNA sometimes is not admissible.
548 posted on 01/24/2005 8:26:03 PM PST by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies ]


To: struggle
Of course, what we are arguing is whether the government, represented by police, is able to search your "effects" without justifiable cause.

Correct me if I'm wrong about this case. The dog wasn't searching the car was it? Both dog and cop were simply sniffing the air in close proximity to the speeder, correct?

552 posted on 01/24/2005 8:31:20 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson