Do they think the historians that drew this stuff made it all up?
There is one thing suspicious about that drawing: the genitalia is covered up. I was in anthropology for a while and (while I am obviously not an expert) all the "human sacrifice" art we saw featured very naked captives. Genitalia was never coyly covered by a draped cloth or shielded by a bent let. It was always right out there. Emphasized, in fact, as if to gloat over the captive's naked humiliation.
Oooh...that's gonna leave a mark.
They were healing a man by squeezing apple juice onto his belly wound. What does that have to do with human sacrifice? [/idiot lefty]