Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Motherbear

I agree that adopting at 67 seems less selfish. I disagree that a 67 year old would be allowed to adopt. For example, 55 is generally the upper limit for adoption in Russia, with 45 being the limit for infants.

http://www.ftia.org/russia/legalreq.html

My point is, too often around here everyone throws out the "just adopt" card as if it's like buying a quart of milk. There are plenty of restrictions and hurdles that make that impossible in many cases.


82 posted on 01/23/2005 6:42:02 PM PST by ellery (Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: ellery

At 67, with no husband, and planning to continue full-time work, perhaps she should just accept that she's not in a good situation to be a first-time mother, through birth or adoption.


83 posted on 01/23/2005 6:49:03 PM PST by Tax-chick (Wielder of the Dread Words of Power, "Bless your heart, honey!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson