Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SouthernFreebird

So the logic here is that if one is too tired, one should refuse to accept a pregnancy and that it should never be necessary for children to take care of their parents?


17 posted on 01/23/2005 7:26:52 AM PST by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Mach9



No, our bodies naturally stop having babies at a reasonable age. 66 yr old women are in no way, shape of form capable of raising a baby for the next 18 years.

I agree with the poster who said this was an immoral thing to do.


18 posted on 01/23/2005 7:34:29 AM PST by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Mach9

Let us not forget this is NOT her baby.


21 posted on 01/23/2005 7:41:26 AM PST by Mfkmmof4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Mach9
children to take care of their parents?

How do you take care of anonymous (the father)? Children need a father IMHO... Biological or not... In this case, neither is provided.

25 posted on 01/23/2005 7:48:42 AM PST by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" -Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson