"Macroevolutionary theory, on the other hand, has done virtually nothing except cause conflict."
It is the role of sciecne to define our natural world, not keep the peace.
"Macroevolution is a misapplication of the scientific method as are the global warming theories."
Well, in all fairness, the scientific community completely disagrees with you. Everything we know about the stars is from mill/bill years ago. We can even do spectral analysis on the light from stars and know what light elements that star has produced the most of. We learn this from the light! Light from billions of years ago! How is this any different from looking at fossils, only millions of years old, and knowing how they worked? Not to mention the overwhelming evidence from DNA, which CAN be duplicated in a lab, and does prove macroevolution.
According to DNA, we are more closely related to chimps than horses are to zebras. I know we are 70% (or whatever) identical to an orange to, but that's because ALL life evolved from the same set of genes. DNA, discovered AFTER evolutionary sciecne, completely agrees with evolution...