Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beckett

He wrote books about how the US gave the bomb to Israel?

Umm... It is a well-known fact that France gave Israel all the components and the technology to produce nuclear weapons.


9 posted on 01/22/2005 6:02:05 AM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: JustDoItAlways

He wrote books about how the US gave the bomb to Israel?

Umm... It is a well-known fact that France gave Israel all the components and the technology to produce nuclear weapons.




Hersh's book covers that in the early chapters; most of it is about how successive US governements have averted their eyes from the development of the Israeli nuclear strike capability.

Another book, by Martin van Creveld explores how this capability has shaped conflict in the region:

Nuclear Proliferation and the Future of Conflict
by Martin Van Creveld
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0029331560/qid=1107120652/sr=1-14/ref=sr_1_14/002-4274662-0898443?v=glance&s=books

Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Though the possibility of nuclear confrontation between superpowers has greatly diminished since the end of the Cold War, the possession of nuclear weapons by states whose conflicts are unresolved could turn out to be equally threatening, notes Van Creveld ( The Transformation of War ). He here considers the likelihood of conflict between North and South Korea, China and Taiwan, China and India, India and Pakistan, Israel and the Arab states, as well as the nuclear status of other countries currently developing the scientific, technological and industrial infrastructure that would enable them to build weapons of mass destruction. Van Creveld begins this academic study by describing the basic characteristics of large-scale warfare as it evolved before the introduction of nuclear weapons and the effect of the latter on both the countries that possess them and on those countries threatened by them. Finally, he assesses the impact of nuclear proliferation on the future of war itself, including the configuration of the armies that would be prepared to wage it. For specialists.
Copyright 1993 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Kirkus Reviews
A somewhat reassuring audit of the residual threat posed by nuclear weapons, from a military analyst whose previous predictions have proved chillingly prescient. With defense budgets in both the US and the erstwhile USSR in full retreat, van Creveld (History/Hebrew University, Jersusalem; The Transformation of War, 1991, etc.) focuses on the state of the atomic-arms art in a clutch of less-developed countries--China, India, Iraq, Israel, Pakistan, etc. Among other matters, his informed survey considers the impact of strategic circumstances on national nuclear policies, and provides estimates of each country's atomic inventories. For various reasons, van Creveld concludes that the use of A-bombs or their tactical equivalents by Third World nations is effectively foreclosed. In the case of Pakistan, for instance, the author contends that the development of a nuclear arsenal has made its rulers ``simultaneously more confident of themselves and less adventurous.'' Which is not to say that van Creveld believes the West to be home free. Indeed, he reiterates previous warnings as to the faltering capacity of even modern industrial powers to monopolize violence, let alone combat or contain terrorism, grass-roots insurgencies, and allied belligerencies. For the time being, however, van Creveld doesn't see any danger of nuclear holocaust at the hands of the less- developed nations. A perceptive study that affords a measure of cold comfort on the score of deterrence. -- Copyright ©1993, Kirkus Associates, LP.


11 posted on 01/30/2005 1:34:48 PM PST by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson