Posted on 01/21/2005 9:26:27 AM PST by Iconoclast2
But wet panties make them feel good, like they are accomplishing something. (SARCASM)
I think he is probably just pandering to the Democrats and since he won't be in a position to propose or vote for legislation, I can't see any reason to get my panties in a wad over his appointment. Besides, after the Democrats finish with a Republican A.G., his chances are somewhere between zilch and none to get confirmed to any court which suits me just fine as far as Gonzales is concerned.
Ask your wife to slap you. What he is saying is that in this one instance he and those groups see the same outcome. He wants Gonzales OUT as AG.
Of course, Gonzales will enthusiastically enforce the "law" (actually there is no "law") for biological diversity in college admissions. He went to the mat to oppose Ted Olsen on this issue.
Just like he "pandered" when he successfully opposed Ted Olsen to get the Bush administration to endorse biological diversity in college admissions in the University of Michigan case?
Because the AWB is nothing more than a Trojan horse, and Bush administration officials refuse to call a spade a spade.
Why not blame Bush instead of Gonzales? He's not acting on his own when he is counsel to the president. Must be Bush was happy with the stand Gonzales took or he would not be the nominee for A.G.
I'll just consider you an adjunct of the Communist Party USA, People for the American Way or the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund ...
What you and your wife do in your house is your private affair ...
I hope ...
"I, Joseph Farah, am joining with an informal coalition that includes the Communist Party USA, People for the American Way and the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund to block confirmation of the Alberto Gonzales as attorney general. Granted, my reasons for opposing this guy are a bit different that the groups named above."
"But I agree with them that he must be stopped.
I never had much use for Gonzales, but the last straw came this week when he told the U.S. Senate he supports extending the expired federal assault weapons ban."
______________________________________
af_vet_1981 wrote:
This is all I ever want to know about Joseph Farah.
Poof! All gone!
LOL I had never thought of making videos. But you know, two old people aren't very exciting, I don't think.
Um, the BATF JBTs didn't have the warrant in their possession when they stormed Waco. They weren't there to arrest anyone, they were there to kill people. Koresh could have been picked up in town if an arrest were necessary, but he even invited BATF in earlier to inspect whatever it was of his/theirs they wanted to inspect. (The BATF refused. "We've got other plans.")
"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Will he enforce that law?
I believe he will.
These are your (new) friends and allies in your campaign of hate against President George W. Bush, who will leave you in the dust bin of history along with the rest of the DU crowd.
In both cases, government goon squads went to commit murder on the flimsiest of pretenses.
One case under Klinton, one under Bush the first.
But that's all right with you, isn't it?
Got your nice, shiny Black Magnums on right now, don't you?
"I, Joseph Farah, am joining with an informal coalition that includes the Communist Party USA, People for the American Way and the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund to block confirmation of the Alberto Gonzales as attorney general. Granted, my reasons for opposing this guy are a bit different that the groups named above."
"But I agree with them that he must be stopped.
I never had much use for Gonzales, but the last straw came this week when he told the U.S. Senate he supports extending the expired federal assault weapons ban."
______________________________________
af_vet_1981 wrote:
This is all I ever want to know about Joseph Farah.
He may not be able to create a law, but he can direct the BATFE to make the lives of dealers and owners of military sytled semi-automatic anti-assault weapons a living hell. He could also get them to regulate them out of existance. He could also write a legal brief (administrative finding like Ashcrofts's) that the 2nd amendment does not give people the right to own them. There are many ways to ban them without Congress being involved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.